Commit 34e29daa authored by Vladimir Reinharz's avatar Vladimir Reinharz
Browse files

clarification binding intertafces

parent 174e550b
......@@ -286,8 +286,7 @@ Since both negative and positive correlations can indicate
positions of interest, we use two different, $\zeta^-$ and $\zeta^+$, thresholds for the \NPMI{}s. $\zeta^+$ will be a bound on the positive values of the \NPMI and $\zeta^-$ on the negative ones. Due to the
high number of possible combinations, \NPMI{}s having values $-1$ are frequent and uninformative. They are discarded.
For those loops deemed as regions of interest, we predict that the positions having an \NPMI above $\zeta^+$ (resp. below $\zeta^-$)
{\color{red} are binding interfaces} while the others do not.
For those loops deemed as regions of interest, we predict that the {\color{red} set of} positions having an \NPMI above $\zeta^+$ {\color{red} or} below $\zeta^-$ {\color{red} are binding interfaces} while the others {\color{red}are} not.
{\removelatexerror
\begin{algorithm}
\DontPrintSemicolon
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment